Natural Moral Law is a theory created by Saint Thomas Aquinas. Aquinas believed that we all share the same purpose. The principles of Natural Moral Law incorporate the use of reason from a Christian background. Aquinas called the God-given purpose of humans the Primary Receptor. The primary precepts are:
1) To live and to protect the innocent
2) To reproduce
3) To educate the young
4) To live peacefully
5) To worship God
1) To live and to protect the innocent
2) To reproduce
3) To educate the young
4) To live peacefully
5) To worship God
Overall, I think that believers of Natural Moral Law would agree in Cryopreservation. If we continued to Cryopreservate, we would ultimately be able to sustain the human population forever! There is nothing which Natural Moral law states to go against Cryopreservation, if anything it is agreeing completely with the primary precepts.
Cryopreservation is ultimately helping us to live and protect the innocent which will lead to all the other precepts being followed. By sustaining life we will then, as a human race, be able to reproduce. This inturn would hopefully lead to us continuing to educate the young. The end product would hopefully be a pantheistic and peaceful society in which everyone is cooperative with each other. Overall Natural Moral Law would be in complete favour of Cryopreservation.
As always, there are challenges in the road to the perfect world. One of the main ones being the uncertainty of Cryopreservation. Bearing in mind the fact that science still has not found a method of resuscitating any single human back to full health, this would cause a problem when trying to put in place the method of creating a pantheistic, peaceful society. However there is nothing in the principles behind Natural Moral Law to go against Cryopreservation in terms of certainty. Since Natural Moral Law has no implications of certainty it is certain that Beliverw would completely agree and support the theory of Cryopreservation.
Cryopreservation is ultimately helping us to live and protect the innocent which will lead to all the other precepts being followed. By sustaining life we will then, as a human race, be able to reproduce. This inturn would hopefully lead to us continuing to educate the young. The end product would hopefully be a pantheistic and peaceful society in which everyone is cooperative with each other. Overall Natural Moral Law would be in complete favour of Cryopreservation.
As always, there are challenges in the road to the perfect world. One of the main ones being the uncertainty of Cryopreservation. Bearing in mind the fact that science still has not found a method of resuscitating any single human back to full health, this would cause a problem when trying to put in place the method of creating a pantheistic, peaceful society. However there is nothing in the principles behind Natural Moral Law to go against Cryopreservation in terms of certainty. Since Natural Moral Law has no implications of certainty it is certain that Beliverw would completely agree and support the theory of Cryopreservation.